Mitigating Geopolitical Risk – Japan as a Stabilizer in Asia
In the current tumultuous geopolitical setting, Tokyo may have a very specific, stabilizing role to play.
Japan indeed has, at the same time, very close ties to the United States, due to its long-term alliance, and very tight economic ties with China, due to geographical closeness and a long history of economic and trade relations. As the US-China rivalry becomes more severe, degrading from a trade war to an ideological confrontation and tensions in the Taiwan Strait, Tokyo has to find a way to protect both its security and economic interests.
Tokyo has no choice but to remain pegged to the American camp, while striving to maintain stable and functional relations with Beijing. It must constantly navigate between cooperation and competition in an attempt to preserve its interests. Therefore, Japan is striving to define the conditions for a secured cooperation with its neighbor and to set up, in close coordination with Washington and its other strategic partners, a strict framework of engagement with Beijing. It relies on a heightened deterrence posture in the East China Sea, a counterbalancing policy that also touches geoeconomics, and the implementation of an economic security strategy aimed at protecting technologies and critical sectors, to ensure better resilience of its value chains but also to become an essential center of innovation.
Japan has thus deployed a number of tools to support a positive regional and international order, and to reinforce deterrence against China through closer security ties with the US and other key partners. At the same time, it has tried to mitigate the great power competition and build bridges between like-minded partners such as Europeans and Americans. Finally, it has tried to set up a modus vivendi to continue to trade with China under more secure conditions by establishing a pioneer economic security strategy.
> Read the whole article on the website of Japan Spotlight
Available in:
Regions and themes
Share
Céline PAJON
Chercheuse, responsable de la recherche Japon et Indo-Pacifique, Centre Asie de l'Ifri
Center for Asian Studies
Asia is a nerve center for multiple global economic, political and security challenges. The Center for Asian Studies provides documented expertise and a platform for discussion on Asian issues to accompany decision makers and explain and contextualize developments in the region for the sake of a larger public dialogue.
The Center's research is organized along two major axes: relations between Asia's major powers and the rest of the world; and internal economic and social dynamics of Asian countries. The Center's research focuses primarily on China, Japan, India, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific, but also covers Southeast Asia, the Korean peninsula and the Pacific Islands.
The Centre for Asian Studies maintains close institutional links with counterpart research institutes in Europe and Asia, and its researchers regularly carry out fieldwork in the region.
The Center organizes closed-door roundtables, expert-level seminars and a number of public events, including an Annual Conference, that welcome experts from Asia, Europe and the United States. The work of Center’s researchers, as well as that of their partners, is regularly published in the Center’s electronic journal Asie.Visions.
Pakistan and the Israel-Palestine Conflict: Transformation in Pakistan’s Approach After the War in Gaza
Pakistan has long combined vocal support for the Palestinian cause with covert engagement with Israel. Since the war in Gaza, this balance has become untenable: public opinion is united against Israel, joining Trump’s Board of Peace has drawn rare cross-party criticism, and new regional alignments put normalization out of reach.
The Oceania Factor in France’s Evolving Indo-Pacific Strategy
This paper examines the two-way relationship between France’s Indo-Pacific strategy and developments in Oceania. Oceania was not a priority in the initial years of France’s Indo-Pacific strategy, as the region was largely treated as secondary to major strategic hotspots and key partnerships, while overseas territories were primarily handled as domestic issues and recipients of a top-down strategy.
France’s View: From Diplomacy to Public-Private Action
France has emerged as the EU’s IMEC forerunner, combining port infrastructure, diplomatic alliances and public-private cooperation. With Marseille Fos at its core, the country brings a strategic hub for logistics, energy and digital connectivity to the corridor.
Trump II, the Crisis of the Rules-Based Order and Europe’s Indo-Pacific Strategy
This article examines the implications of Trump II for Europe’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific. The piece contends that Trump II is accelerating the erosion of the rules-based order and undermining the relevance of the Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) concept, while forcing Europe to refocus on its own continental security amid US retrenchment. Paradoxically, these very constraints create conditions for a more autonomous, pragmatic, and explicitly interest-driven European engagement in the Indo-Pacific, rather than outright withdrawal.