The dilemma of the Franco-African military relationship: reinvent or turn the page?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be90/1be905ce5e8499179173ab7f86e607a0064ced22" alt="Le dilemme de la relation militaire franco-africaine Réinventer ou tourner la page ? Thierry VIRCOULON, Ifri, novembre 2024"
The origins of military presence and cooperation in Africa can be traced back to the tacit decolonization pact between the countries of French-speaking Africa. This cooperation led to the creation of African armies in the former colonies, as part of a project to prevent the spread of communism and maintain France's influence in the newly independent countries.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9845/c9845b4dbe69e76c902cd0598a4bfc66016cbdf4" alt="Ansongo, Mali, décembre 2015 – Formation d’un soldat malien par un soldat français dans le cadre de l’opération militaire Barkhane"
The dilemma of the Franco-African military relationship: reinvent or turn the page?
From 1970 to the beginning of the 21st century, the French army's overseas operations on the continent have been multiplied to an over-militarizing the Franco-African relationship. They overshadowed its other dimensions and are distorting the vision of France's interests in Africa.
By 2024, the reasons for French military cooperation in Africa have all but disappeared. The only justification for this cooperation is to help West African governments combat the spread of the jihadist threat.
Instead of demilitarizing the Franco-African relationship, the French government is seeking to invent a new model of military partnership. It is politically risky and will not put an end to the most visible and criticized aspects of the Franco-African military relationship.
The memo is only available in French.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesThe United Nations Mission in Congo or the exemplary uselessness of the United Nations peacekeepers
During the M23 conflict in 2012-2013 in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the United Nations (UN) took the diplomatic initiative (by initiating the Addis Ababa agreement) and the military initiative (by launching a coordinated counter-offensive with the Congolese army). Since the resurgence of this conflict in 2022, the United Nations, which still has more than 10,000 peacekeepers deployed in eastern DRC, no longer plays any role.
Rebooting Italy's Africa Policy: Making the Mattei Plan Work
Against the backdrop of increasing anti-French rhetoric across parts of Francophone Africa, the relative failure of the counterinsurgency operation in the central Sahel (Operation Barkhane) and diplomatic rifts with several Sahelian countries, Paris has been rethinking its relationship with the continent for several years now. As a former imperial power that has seen its colonial domain in Africa gain independence between 1956 (Morocco-Tunisia) and 1977 (Djibouti), France has invented two successive roles for itself in Africa since 1960, particularly in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.
The Evolution of City Diplomacy in Africa: Impact, Potential, and Ongoing Challenges of African Cities’ International Activities.
Over the past decades, African cities have ranked among the leading players in the evolution of city diplomacy. Indeed, municipalities across the continent have gone beyond simply adapting to shifting trends in international cooperation. They have been shaping the current partnership approach that sees local authorities worldwide working together to pursue shared goals and address common urban challenges such as climate change, migration, and social justice.
The High Authority for Peacebuilding (HACP) in Niger 2011-2023. Placing the State at the heart of conflict prevention and management.
Like other Sahelian countries, Niger has been affected by terrorism for almost two decades now. This issue has highlighted both the limits of these countries’ security systems and, more profoundly, their inability to offer stability to the populations of certain parts of the country. In a way, these “jihadized insurgencies” are a continuity of groups that regularly take up arms against central states.