Practical information
Themes and regions
Related centers and programs
In the wake of Donald Trump's re-election in the United States, Europeans face a crucial imperative: rethinking their sovereignty, especially in the technological realm. What will be the strategic priorities and action levers of the new European Commission on this issue? What assessment can we make of the previous Commission’s achievements and challenges in navigating Sino-American technological competition, transatlantic dependencies, and emerging global partnerships?
The conference will address the need for Europe to assert its technological sovereignty by reducing reliance on external powers, fostering homegrown innovation, and forming strategic alliances. By reflecting on past policies and outlining future prospects, the objective is to provide a comprehensive roadmap for Europe to secure its place as a global technology leader amidst shifting geopolitical dynamics.
Keynote (13:45-14:15 CEST)
Gilles Babinet, Co-chairman of the National Digital Council
Bruno Sportisse, Chairman and CEO at Inria
Panel 1: Navigating Sino-American Competition (14:15-15:30)
The competition between China and the United States is reshaping the global technological landscape. From advancements in artificial intelligence to 6G networks, the race for technological supremacy has far-reaching implications for Europe. How can Europe position itself in this “tech cold war”?
Speakers:
Peter Sandler, Director, Directorate General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Tobias Gehrke, Senior Policy Fellow, European Council on Foreign Relations
Agatha Kratz, Director, Rhodium Group
Moderator: Mathilde Velliet, Research Fellow, Geopolitics of Technology Center, Ifri
Panel 2: Mitigating Europe’s Dependence on the Other Side of the Atlantic (15:45-17:00)
Europe’s technological sector has long been intertwined with that of the United States. While this relationship has fostered growth and innovation, it also raises concerns about dependence. How can Europe become more strategically autonomous?
Speakers:
Pierre Chastanet, Head of Unit C3 – Microelectronics and Photonics, CNECT, European Commission
Sarah Guillou, Economist, OFCE Sciences Po
Mark Scott, Senior Resident Fellow, Atlantic Council
Moderator: Julien Nocetti, Associate Fellow, Geopolitics of Technology Center, Ifri
Panel 3: Embracing New Partnerships (17:15-18:30)
As the geopolitical landscape evolves, Europe must forge new partnerships to bolster its technological standing. At the same time, a global debate on risks is underway in various forums. Can we hope for a Brussels effect in these emerging partnerships?
Speakers:
Diana-Paula Gherasim, Research Fellow, Head of European Energy and Climate Policies, Energy and Climate Center, Ifri
Sanho Lim, Senior Specialist, Center for Economic Security and Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea
Trisha Ray, Associate Director and Resident Fellow, GeoTech Center, Atlantic Council
Moderator: Laure de Roucy-Rochegonde, Head of the Geopolitics of Technology Center, Ifri
This event is public and will be held in English in a hybrid format (online and at Ifri).
Related Subjects
Other events
Brussels, Germany, France and Italy Facing the Energy and Industrial Crises: Coordinated or Diverging Trajectories?
Amidst soaring defense spending, higher borrowing costs, erosion of energy intensive industries, renewed energy price hikes and possibly physical shortages, the European Union and its Member States are again struggling to stabilize the European economies. Governments are tempted by uncoordinated, short-term moves while in Brussels, there is a struggle between the “more of the same” and the “scrap it largely” approaches to the transition.
Geopolitical stakes of the New Moon race
As the United States, China, and India solidify their lunar ambitions, Europe is still seeking to define its stance: should it be a reliable partner or an autonomous strategic player? This conference will examine the stakes of this new race to the Moon and Europe’s interest in asserting itself as a lunar power through partnerships, industrial ambitions, and whether its participation in the new lunar race serves as a lever for strategic autonomy and internal cohesion, or an illustration of its dependence.