Doors Wide Shut? An Update on FDI Regulations in China

The fears of a rise in economic nationalism in China have been fueled by a number of recent moves, such as changes in the law on indigenous innovation or the enactment of a national security review (NSR) regulation for M&As by foreign enterprises. The objective of the current paper is twofold: First is to provide an update on the investment environment in China in order to determine whether or not these provisions reflect a move in the direction of more protectionism, and second is to suggest ways for European countries to level the playing field for their firms wishing to invest in China.
The general message is that no clear-cut trend can be identified. While it cannot be said that the regulatory environment is increasingly rigid, there has not lately been any clear loosening of restrictiveness either.
The recently promulgated changes to the catalogue on foreign investment guidance point to further opening, in particular with fewer restricted categories. However, this positive change is counterbalanced by the persistence of ownership restrictions in particular. Similarly, although the Chinese government has backtracked on its decision to connect indigenous innovation policy and government procurement, the Chinese public procurement market is still heavily restricted for foreign investors. Lastly, the implementation of the merger review under the anti-monopoly law suggests that foreign firms are to some extent being discriminated against even if the recently enacted NSR procedure should not bring major changes to the existing regulatory setting.
More generally, with an important level of discretion left in the hands of Chinese authorities at all levels of responsibility, the business environment remains complex for foreign investors. A major problem in the Chinese case relates to the lack of transparency and of stability in the regulatory environment. The vagueness of some provisions (economic security is a case in point) and the lack of precision in the responsibilities assumed by various levels of government (be they central or provincial, as in the case of the indigenous innovation catalogues) generate an opaque and uncertain business environment. Retroactive application of some regulations is also not uncommon, further increasing the lack of predictability in the regulatory environment.
The challenge for China's partners is to find the best way, beyond regulatory reforms, to level the playing field for their firms operating in China. This paper calls for opening negotiations on a bilateral investment treaty between China and the EU. The treaty needs to be ambitious and comprehensive, covering both pre and post-establishment issues (market access as well as investment protection in particular). One major advantage of a BIT negotiation is that it would be based on a global approach to FDI-related issues, thus allowing trade-offs between various objectives.
Available in:
Regions and themes
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Doors Wide Shut? An Update on FDI Regulations in China
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analyses
RAMSES 2024. A World to Be Remade
For its 42nd edition, RAMSES 2024 identifies three major challenges for 2024.
France and the Philippines should anchor their maritime partnership
With shared interests in promoting international law and sustainable development, France and the Philippines should strengthen their maritime cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. Through bilateral agreements, expanded joint exercises and the exchange of best practices, both nations can enhance maritime domain awareness, counter security threats and develop blue economy initiatives. This deeper collaboration would reinforce stability and environmental stewardship across the region.
The China-led AIIB, a geopolitical tool?
The establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) in 2016, on a Chinese initiative, constituted an attempt to bridge the gap in infrastructure financing in Asia. However, it was also perceived in the West as a potential vehicle for China’s geostrategic agendas, fueling the suspicion that the institution might compete rather than align with existing multilateral development banks (MDBs) and impose its own standards.
Jammu and Kashmir in the Aftermath of August 2019
The abrogation of Article 370, which granted special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), has been on the agenda of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for many decades.