Comply or die ? Les entreprises face à l’exigence de conformité venue des États-Unis
The United States has developed a vast body of legal regulations with extraterritorial application in order to tackle corruption on the international stage and to pursue companies that do not abide by the trade embargoes demanded by U.S. foreign policy.
The main text regarding corruption is the Foreign Corruption Protection Act (FCPA) of 1977. Embargoes are supervised by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), an agency of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. They are either imposed on countries and individuals, or ban specific items, on the basis of ad hoc laws and regulations such as ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulation) and EAR (Export Administration Regulation).
Since 1998, the American justice system has extended the definition of the link that binds a foreign actor to the United States (the nexus) and constitutes the legal basis for prosecution. If the use of the U.S. dollar represents the most frequent nexus, present-day criteria include the employment of an American citizen, participating in a meeting in the U.S. or sending an email through a server located in the United States. The simple use of American software may soon also be considered a nexus.
French and European companies have often been sued and fined in recent years. Could the U.S. “legal soft-power” have underlying economic and strategic objectives? This would appear very inequitable given that Russian and Chinese companies are not being prosecuted… Furthermore, a majority of legal cases are actually solved through transactions (i.e. Deferred Prosecution Agreements – DPA), a way of escaping expensive and uncertain trials, at the expense of obtaining a true legal verdict.
In response, Europeans have started to adopt their own regulations. In France, the Sapin 2 law of December 2016 establishes an obligation for French companies to develop their own compliance rules against corruption. This evolution could result in a decrease in legal action from the United States.
The observance of U.S.-imposed embargoes, for its part, depends on diplomatic developments. While the signature of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) appeared to allow the long-awaited lifting of international sanctions against Iran, where European companies are preparing to invest, the change of attitude of the U.S. administration since the election of Donald Trump is a real game-changer.
This content is available in French: "Comply or die ? Les entreprises face à l’exigence de conformité venue des États-Unis"
Author(s)
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programs
Americas Program
Ifri's work on the Americas region focuses mainly on the United States. Indeed, for more than 20 years, Ifri's Americas Program has provided keys to understanding American society and domestic policy while shedding light on developments in the country's foreign policy, including transatlantic relations and trade issues.
Since 2023, a specific axis on Latin America structures more actively Ifri's research on this region.
Ifri's Canada program was active in 2015 and 2016.
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
Kamala Harris's Economic Program
Since receiving the Democratic nomination in the wake of President Joe Biden’s decision to step aside in the 2024 American presidential race, Vice-President Kamala Harris has been striving to define her own policy platform to attract voters in the limited time remaining before the November 5th election. Since the economy is a central issue for American voters, Harris developed several propositions in that area.
IRA: Towards Clean Hydrogen Leadership in the U.S.
Although late in adopting clean hydrogen (H2) and defining a national strategy–a draft was presented by the Department of Energy (DOE) in September 2022–, the United States (US) has strongly reinforced its support to clean hydrogen with the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in August 2022.
Convince and Coerce: U.S. Interference in Technology Exchanges Between its Allies and China
The tough-on-China policy adopted by the Trump and Biden administrations has – and will increasingly have – important consequences for Washington’s allies, both on their infrastructure choices (5G, submarine cables...) and on their technological exchanges with China.
AUKUS Rocks the Boat in the Indo-Pacific, And It’s Not Good News
For anyone who still harbored doubts, Washington made crystal clear from the announcement of the new trilateral alliance with Australia and the UK (AUKUS) that countering China is its number one priority, and that it will do whatever it takes to succeed. Much has been said about the consequences of AUKUS on the French-US relations, but the strategic implications for the Indo-Pacific nations (including France), and for China especially, are also critical to consider.