A Tragic Tale of Corn and Congress

Ever since Iowa landed the privilege of holding the first Presidential primary, no candidate has the political courage to confront the $11 billion subsidy price tag of US corn ethanol. Everyone agrees we need to dilute our supply and price vulnerability in transportation fuels and everyone agrees we need to decarbonize the transport sector. But surely not this way.
There is no environmental justification for corn ethanol if net carbon savings are counted across the entire range on inputs of the final product - including alternative land use. And by most calculations, the few tons of CO2 saved probably cost tax payers over $700 per ton. Maybe the learning experiences of handling biofuels, blending, combustion technologies and infrastructure will help us move on to second generation biofuels. But does our apprenticeship have to be so expensive and damaging? It is hard to balance a budget this way.
Forty percent of the world’s corn is grown in the US and 40% of that goes into producing ethanol. America’s livestock now consume less corn that America’s alambics. Meanwhile, the price of corn has doubled to nearly $8.00 a bushel in a year which aggravates a food crisis that is visible every night on the television. America’s corn ethanol program does not cause the hunger around the world - but its impact on grain markets certainly makes hunger harder to resolve. Of course starving Africans don’t vote in the US.
Even Brazil has understood that if food conversion to ethanol starts to impair broader welfare through price inflation, it’s time to cut back on support for the scheme. Ironically, reduced production of sugar-based ethanol in Brazil is being compensated by exports of subsidized US corn-based ethanol from the US. Fortunately for US producers, the US only has an import duty of 54 $cents on alcohol, but no export levy.
No one believes for a moment that the US will scrap its corn ethanol program and save the whole $11 billion in subsidies, but at a minimum the program is over-subsidized. It cannot be justified on energy policy grounds or environmental policy grounds. So if it’s only real justification is political, it is time to restore corn to the food chain. The US Senate seems to know this. The Obama Administration should seize the opportunity to undo this program.
Available in:
Regions and themes
Share
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesReconnecting With Europe's Nuclear DNA: a Political Question
As Europe's main source of low-carbon electricity, nuclear power is a strategic asset for tackling climate and geopolitical challenges.
Will the Western Nuclear Power Revival Take Place? The State of Extra-European Advances
Against the dual backdrop of the energy transition and the rapid transformation of the international order, the question of Western nuclear revival is being raised with renewed acuity.
Re-evaluating Copper Supply: The Crucial Role of Technology
Some authors argue that the energy transition is doomed to fail due to metal scarcity and the rising energy costs of extraction.
The Strategic Dimension of Power System Flexibility: Opportunities in Europe
The European Union has embarked on an energy transition aimed primarily at replacing fossil fuels by electrifying demand.