It was good of Gazprom to choose the first days of summer for this commercial dispute as European gas demand is off seasonally, demand recovery is slow and stocks are high - except of course in Poland and Lithuania (downstream from Belarus) where gas stocks as a percentage of import dependency are very low. The situation is even more difficult for Russia’s own exclave Kaliningrad.

The Russian expressed a willingness to dispatch monitors to attest to flows of gas to Europe being available at the Russian border should President Lukashenka make good on his threat to cut transit gas to Europe. Furthermore, the Russians suggest helpfully that the Europeans might want to establish an arbitration mechanism between Russia and Belarus?!

Somehow the Russians see themselves as having met their obligations to be responsible suppliers by notifying the Commission of a cutoff after the fact and suggesting Europe take upon itself the political responsibility of finding a solution. The Commission missed an opportunity at 09h00 Monday morning to reject the Russian “Early Warning” as totally unacceptable. Will the next early warning comes one frigid day in January when companies would be stretched to adjust?

Russia has entered into contracts to supply gas to Europe. They have on two major occasions disrupted supplies to Europe as a result of geopolitical and/or commercial disagreements with their “near abroad”. Many thought they would have recognized how much damage this kind of action has already done to their reputation as reliable suppliers. How much of the European impulse to diversify gas supplies is driven by this behavior?

Europe has been more than patient sorting through past Russian gas supply incidents and the policy measures undertaken in the EU to lower European vulnerability to Russian gas diplomacy are progressing. But an “Early Warning System” with Russia that shifts the responsibility of dealing with the consequences to Europe after the fact and that turns to Europe to negotiate a settlement doesn’t appear to be a very good solution.

We learn today that the issue has been “resolved” in the traditional non-transparent way. Perhaps this latest incident can provide an incentive for Europe to restore the burden of responsibility for gas deliveries to Europe back to the supplier who agreed to do so.