Search on Ifri.org

About Ifri

Frequent searches

Suggestions

Punish Iran not Each Other

Editorials
|
Date de publication
|
Référence taxonomie collections
Édito Énergie
Image de couverture de la publication
Punish Iran not Each Other
Corps analyses

The recent spiral of provocations coming out of Iran and President Ahmadi-Nejad"s increasingly uncompelling bravado are both signs that internal tensions are eroding the President"s grip on power. Dissent continues inside Iran after the deeply flawed elections and government heavy handedness. The Iranian ruling class is beginning to feel tarnished by the President"s extreme positions. Now is not the time to elevate President Ahmadi-Nejad to folk hero status by muscular actions like a blockade of Iranian imports. Such a blockade would serve President Ahmadi-Nejad very nicely indeed. Few citizens anywhere in the world are more nationalistic than the Iranians who would rally around even this President if provoked from the outside.

Current sanctions are building pressure on the regime and Iranians can see the offer of engagement from abroad. The oil and gas sectors are not drawing anywhere near the international capital they need - notwithstanding the Chinese. Lower oil prices are aggravating budget tensions. Otherwise exportable gas is being re-injected to sustain falling oil production and demographic pressures are mounting as society watches the world through the internet.

Rumblings in the US House of Representatives about a new sanctions bill are ominous. The draft legislation sponsored by Howard Berman has many of the self-defeating characteristics of the Iran Libya Sanctions Act (ILSA) and many of the same protagonists are at work. Remember that ILSA did not unite allies in the imposition of sanctions on Iran or Libya, it tore them apart over the extraterritoriality of US unilateral sanctions that would punish foreign commercial entities. Now is not the time to break ranks.

Co-operation among key allies is working. Efforts to engage the Russians and Chinese in the Security Council will fail for a multitude of reasons just as they did during more than ten years of sanctions on Saddam Hussein from 1991 until March of 2003. Why demonstrate the divisions? The idea under discussion of squeezing companies who provide insurance on Iranian oil product shipments is just the kind of well tailored sanction allies called for in the late 1990s - these are smart sanctions and don"t require Russian or Chinese participation.

Change will not be imposed on Iran from the outside. But pressure for change is building inside and discontent with political oppression, isolation and lower economic expectations is becoming dangerous for the Iranian leadership. This is the time for effective unity among allies - not a search for symmetry in the Security Council, muscular sanctions actions or US Congressional unilateralism. Stay the course with the offer of engagement still on the table strengthened by smart sanctions - they are working.

 

 

Decoration

Also available in:

Regions and themes

Thématiques analyses

Share

Decoration
Author(s)
Photo
photowr3_modifie-1.jpg

William C. RAMSAY

Intitulé du poste

Directeur du Centre Energie de l'Ifri de 2008 à 2011, Conseiller de 2012 à 2016

Image principale
Climate & Energy
Center for Energy & Climate
Accroche centre

Ifri's Energy and Climate Center carries out activities and research on the geopolitical and geoeconomic issues of energy transitions such as energy security, competitiveness, control of value chains, and acceptability. Specialized in the study of European energy/climate policies as well as energy markets in Europe and around the world, its work also focuses on the energy and climate strategies of major powers such as the United States, China or India. It offers recognized expertise, enriched by international collaborations and events, particularly in Paris and Brussels.

Image principale

India’s Broken Power Economics : Addressing DISCOM Challenges

Date de publication
15 October 2024
Accroche

India’s electricity demand is rising at an impressive annual rate of 9%. From 2014 to 2023, the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) surged from 1.95 trillion dollars ($) to $3.2 trillion (constant 2015 US$), and the nation is poised to maintain this upward trajectory, with projected growth rates exceeding 7% in 2024 and 2025.  Correspondingly, peak power demand has soared from 136 gigawatts (GW) in 2014 to 243 GW in 2024, positioning India as the world’s third-largest energy consumer. In the past decade, the country has increased its power generation capacity by a remarkable 190 GW, pushing its total installed capacity beyond 400 GW. 

Image principale

The Troubled Reorganization of Critical Raw Materials Value Chains: An Assessment of European De-risking Policies

Date de publication
30 September 2024
Accroche

With the demand for critical raw materials set to, at a minimum, double by 2030 in the context of the current energy transition policies, the concentration of critical raw materials (CRM) supplies and, even more, of refining capacities in a handful of countries has become one of the paramount issues in international, bilateral and national discussions. China’s dominant position and successive export controls on critical raw materials (lately, germanium, gallium, rare earths processing technology, graphite, antimony) point to a trend of weaponizing critical dependencies.

Image principale

The Aluminum Value Chain: A Key Component of Europe’s Strategic Autonomy and Carbon Neutrality

Date de publication
29 July 2024
Accroche

The United States of America (US), Canada and the European Union (EU) all now consider aluminum as strategic. This metal is indeed increasingly used, especially for the energy transition, be it for electric vehicles (EVs), electricity grids, wind turbines or solar panels.

Image principale

The EU Green Deal External Impacts: Views from China, India, South Africa, Türkiye and the United States

Date de publication
29 May 2024
Accroche

Ahead of June 2024 European elections and against the backdrop of growing geopolitical and geoeconomic frictions, if not tensions, between the EU and some of its largest trade partners, not least based on the external impacts of the European Green Deal (EGD), Ifri chose to collect views and analyses from leading experts from China, India, South Africa, Türkiye and the United States of America (US) on how they assess bilateral relations in the field of energy and climate, and what issues and opportunities they envisage going forward. 

Related Subjects

How can this study be cited?

Image de couverture de la publication
Punish Iran not Each Other
Punish Iran not Each Other, from Ifri by
Copy