Punish Iran not Each Other
The recent spiral of provocations coming out of Iran and President Ahmadi-Nejad"s increasingly uncompelling bravado are both signs that internal tensions are eroding the President"s grip on power. Dissent continues inside Iran after the deeply flawed elections and government heavy handedness. The Iranian ruling class is beginning to feel tarnished by the President"s extreme positions. Now is not the time to elevate President Ahmadi-Nejad to folk hero status by muscular actions like a blockade of Iranian imports. Such a blockade would serve President Ahmadi-Nejad very nicely indeed. Few citizens anywhere in the world are more nationalistic than the Iranians who would rally around even this President if provoked from the outside.
Current sanctions are building pressure on the regime and Iranians can see the offer of engagement from abroad. The oil and gas sectors are not drawing anywhere near the international capital they need - notwithstanding the Chinese. Lower oil prices are aggravating budget tensions. Otherwise exportable gas is being re-injected to sustain falling oil production and demographic pressures are mounting as society watches the world through the internet.
Rumblings in the US House of Representatives about a new sanctions bill are ominous. The draft legislation sponsored by Howard Berman has many of the self-defeating characteristics of the Iran Libya Sanctions Act (ILSA) and many of the same protagonists are at work. Remember that ILSA did not unite allies in the imposition of sanctions on Iran or Libya, it tore them apart over the extraterritoriality of US unilateral sanctions that would punish foreign commercial entities. Now is not the time to break ranks.
Co-operation among key allies is working. Efforts to engage the Russians and Chinese in the Security Council will fail for a multitude of reasons just as they did during more than ten years of sanctions on Saddam Hussein from 1991 until March of 2003. Why demonstrate the divisions? The idea under discussion of squeezing companies who provide insurance on Iranian oil product shipments is just the kind of well tailored sanction allies called for in the late 1990s - these are smart sanctions and don"t require Russian or Chinese participation.
Change will not be imposed on Iran from the outside. But pressure for change is building inside and discontent with political oppression, isolation and lower economic expectations is becoming dangerous for the Iranian leadership. This is the time for effective unity among allies - not a search for symmetry in the Security Council, muscular sanctions actions or US Congressional unilateralism. Stay the course with the offer of engagement still on the table strengthened by smart sanctions - they are working.
Available in:
Regions and themes
Share
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesThe New Geopolitics of Energy
Following the dramatic floods in Valencia, and as COP29 opens in Baku, climate change is forcing us to closely reexamine the pace—and the stumbling blocks—of the energy transition.
Can carbon markets make a breakthrough at COP29?
Voluntary carbon markets (VCMs) have a strong potential, notably to help bridge the climate finance gap, especially for Africa.
Taiwan's Energy Supply: The Achilles Heel of National Security
Making Taiwan a “dead island” through “a blockade” and “disruption of energy supplies” leading to an “economic collapse.” This is how Colonel Zhang Chi of the People’s Liberation Army and professor at the National Defense University in Beijing described the objective of the Chinese military exercises in May 2024, following the inauguration of Taiwan’s new president, Lai Ching-te. Similar to the exercises that took place after Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei in August 2022, China designated exercise zones facing Taiwan’s main ports, effectively simulating a military embargo on Taiwan. These maneuvers illustrate Beijing’s growing pressure on the island, which it aims to conquer, and push Taiwan to question its resilience capacity.
India’s Broken Power Economics : Addressing DISCOM Challenges
India’s electricity demand is rising at an impressive annual rate of 9%. From 2014 to 2023, the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) surged from 1.95 trillion dollars ($) to $3.2 trillion (constant 2015 US$), and the nation is poised to maintain this upward trajectory, with projected growth rates exceeding 7% in 2024 and 2025. Correspondingly, peak power demand has soared from 136 gigawatts (GW) in 2014 to 243 GW in 2024, positioning India as the world’s third-largest energy consumer. In the past decade, the country has increased its power generation capacity by a remarkable 190 GW, pushing its total installed capacity beyond 400 GW.