The Economic Pillar of Korea’s New Southern Policy: Building on Existing Assets
Diversification is a key tenet of South Korea’s New Southern Policy (NSP). In the economic sphere, however, the need for diversification is apparently less pressing as, unlike what is observed in the diplomatic and security domains, Korea’s economic partnerships are less unbalanced and are not (or not as clearly) polarized on the big Four (China, Japan, the United States, and Russia).
Although Korea’s economic relations with its “South” – Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and India – seem to be relatively strong already, there is still scope for further development. First, heavy Korean economic involvement in ASEAN is heavily skewed towards Vietnam. Secondly, India remains a marginal economic partner for Korea and may be deemed the weak pillar in its economic strategy so far. Thirdly, except through Official Development Assistance (ODA), the role of the government has remained limited so far in supporting the expansion of economic links between Korea and ASEAN, and to a lesser extent India.
The key question is to determine what the added value of the NSP can be beyond existing private sector-based economic relations. Through the NSP the Korean government provides financial support to facilitate the expansion of private companies’ activities in Korea’s “South”, in particular in sectors in which they would not necessarily engage on their own. The diversification objective of the NSP’s economic pillar is thus not only geographical but also sectoral. The focus is placed on infrastructure development projects in ASEAN and India, and more specifically on niche activities such as smart-city projects.
In addition to such financial support, the Korean government has opted for indirect support through the negotiation and implementation of various trading arrangements – Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) or Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements (CEPAs) – including the recently concluded Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).
The chance of success of the NSP can be deemed relatively high as it does not start from scratch and as Korean private companies’ and government’s interests dovetail quite nicely. Moreover, Korea’s focus on infrastructure is aligned with the recipient countries’ interests, in particular ASEAN’s. However, a major weakness of the strategy is the absence of a powerful and convincing narrative to go with it, which makes Korea’s endeavor less attractive for its potential partners. But, of course, this weakness goes beyond the economic dimension of the NSP and would need to be addressed at a more general level.
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The Economic Pillar of Korea’s New Southern Policy: Building on Existing Assets
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesFrance’s maritime security cooperation in the Pacific
France plays a significant role in Pacific maritime security, particularly through the active participation of its overseas territories and the contribution of its stationed armed forces to regional cooperation initiatives.
Taiwan’s Rising Space Program: Building Up Industry, Supporting National Security
Taiwan, known for its leadership in semiconductors and information and communications technology (ICT), is now making significant strides in the space industry. While historically modest, Taiwan’s space program has seen a transformation since 2020, driven by President Tsai Ing-wen’s commitment to expanding the country’s space capabilities. Key milestones include the passage of the Space Development Act and the creation of the Taiwan Space Agency (TASA), which has bolstered the resources and visibility of Taiwan’s space ambitions.
AI and Technical Standardization in China and the EU: Diverging priorities and the need for common ground
Given the highly disruptive potential of AI, global cooperation on AI safety and governance is imperative, and yet the deeply transformational potential of AI also ensures that a high level of competition and systemic rivalry is likely unavoidable. How can the EU best manage its complex relationship with China in the field of AI so as to ensure a necessary level of cooperation in spite of competition and rivalry?
China’s Quest for a Quantum Leap
The global race to harness quantum science is intensifying. Recognizing the strategic potential of quantum technology for economic, military, and scientific advancement, China is focusing on quantum breakthroughs as a way to shift the balance of power, especially in its competition with the United States. President Xi Jinping has emphasized the importance of scientific innovation, particularly in quantum fields, to fuel national development and ensure security.