Practical information
Registration for this event is now closed.
Local democracy is at the forefront of the challenges facing the EU today. In a context of growing socio-economic difficulties and attacks against the values of citizenship, what can local representatives do in order to support the participation and inclusion of all the citizens?
Europe is facing a series of crises that weakens the capacity of European societies to build citizenship based on equality, inclusion, social progress and tolerance. Citizens’ participation seems to be challenged by a decade of severe economic and financial crisis while nationalistic and xenophobic divisions are tearing Europeans apart through various forms of populist and nativist discourses.
The responses to the so-called “refugee crisis”, the British “leave vote” or the threats to democratic principles, for example in Hungary, highlight that the goal of a more integrated EU, based on human rights and democracy, cannot be taken for granted. In such a context, major elections in 2017 in France, the Netherlands and Germany are a cause for concerns.
Local institutions and civil societies are at the forefront of these challenges. The lack of social cohesion, exclusion and the growing vulnerability of a substantial part of the European population constitute direct challenges for local policies and the ability of civil society actors to mobilize in favor of more integrated societies. At the same time, local authorities can address this situation through various policy tools aimed at supporting social cohesion and democratic participation and inclusion.
Final conference of a 12-month project with elected representatives from 6 European cities
Throughout 2016, the Centre for Migration and Citizenship of the IFRI brought together 28 representatives from 6 European cities (Amsterdam, Athens, Birmingham, Budapest, Lisbon, and Paris) to address this situation. The objective was to launch a discussion about the role of local elected representatives in the making of citizenship in Europe, and the synergies that could be created between local initiatives and EU policies of civic participation.
The project’s final meeting in Brussels aims to broaden the dialogue with European policymakers and stakeholders, including EU institutions, networks of local authorities, civil society organizations active in the fields of migration and democracy, groups of citizens, foundations and political parties.
With the contributions of João Afonso (Vice-Mayor for Social Rights, Lisbon), Paulette Hamilton (Cabinet Member for Heath and Social Care, Birmingham), Gergely Karacsony (Mayor of the Budapest-Zuglo district), Sofyan Mbarki (City Councillor, Amsterdam), Gilles Pelayo (Head of Unit, Education, Audiovisuel and Culture Executive Agency, European Commission), Hermano Sanches Ruivo (Paris Councillor, Delegate in charge of Europe), Maria Stratigaki (Vice-Mayor for Social Solidarity, Welfare and Equality, Athens).
Chair and discussant: Prof. Jan Willem Duyvendak (University of Amsterdam).
Other events
Lunch debate with Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of New Zealand
Discussion co-chaired by Thierry de Montbrial, Executive Chairman of Ifri, member of the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences, and Marc Hecker, Deputy Director of Ifri (in English without translation).
North Korea Beyond Nukes: Focusing on the Human Rights Challenge
Debates surrounding North Korea are primarily focused on security issues, particularly nuclear and ballistic concerns, relegating the critical situation of the North Korean population and human rights violations to the background. The lack of information about the real living conditions of North Koreans contributes to the absence of attention and discussion on this crucial issue.
Shaping Europe’s Technological Sovereignty
In the wake of Donald Trump's re-election in the United States, Europeans face a crucial imperative: rethinking their sovereigny, especially in the technological realm. What will be the strategic priorities and action levers of the new European Commission on this issue? What assessment can we make of the previous Commission’s achievements and challenges in navigating Sino-American technological competition, transatlantic dependencies, and emerging global partnerships?