Complementarity and Rivalry in EU-China Economic Relations in the 21st Century
Economic dynamism in the People’s Republic of China over the past two decades, in contrast with sluggish growth in an enlarged European Union, makes the examination of contemporary and future EU–China economic relations all the more relevant. This examination is done by highlighting complementary and opposing forces between the two regions. It underlines the asymmetry in the trade relationship – with a growing EU trade deficit – and a declining share of EU foreign direct investment since the peak years in the late 1990s.
In terms of trade patterns, a certain degree of complementarity still exists between the two regions, with China relatively engaged in low-knowledge-intensive industries (such as office machinery and computers), although the move up the value chain is rapid. This still leaves scope for a manufacturing–services complementarity. Areas of possible rivalry include the perception, by the EU, of an ‘unfair’ Chinese competition, the opacity of the Chinese market, and allegations of dumping by Chinese firms, an issue related to its non-market economy status.
In the future, the fifth enlargement may lessen the complementarity (and therefore increase the level of competition), thus generating another challenge. Faced with these numerous challenges, a number of solutions are proffered, among which are multilateralism and cooperation on energy
Available in:
Regions and themes
Share
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Complementarity and Rivalry in EU-China Economic Relations in the 21st Century
Center for Asian Studies
Asia is a nerve center for multiple global economic, political and security challenges. The Center for Asian Studies provides documented expertise and a platform for discussion on Asian issues to accompany decision makers and explain and contextualize developments in the region for the sake of a larger public dialogue.
The Center's research is organized along two major axes: relations between Asia's major powers and the rest of the world; and internal economic and social dynamics of Asian countries. The Center's research focuses primarily on China, Japan, India, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific, but also covers Southeast Asia, the Korean peninsula and the Pacific Islands.
The Centre for Asian Studies maintains close institutional links with counterpart research institutes in Europe and Asia, and its researchers regularly carry out fieldwork in the region.
The Center organizes closed-door roundtables, expert-level seminars and a number of public events, including an Annual Conference, that welcome experts from Asia, Europe and the United States. The work of Center’s researchers, as well as that of their partners, is regularly published in the Center’s electronic journal Asie.Visions.
Trump II, the Crisis of the Rules-Based Order and Europe’s Indo-Pacific Strategy
This article examines the implications of Trump II for Europe’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific. The piece contends that Trump II is accelerating the erosion of the rules-based order and undermining the relevance of the Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) concept, while forcing Europe to refocus on its own continental security amid US retrenchment. Paradoxically, these very constraints create conditions for a more autonomous, pragmatic, and explicitly interest-driven European engagement in the Indo-Pacific, rather than outright withdrawal.
China and Trade in Critical Raw Materials (CRMs)
Critical raw materials (CRMs) have become central features of a new dynamic in global power politics, with China now wielding considerable leverage. Amid rising regional and global uncertainty, resource security is back in the spotlight as a key determinant of sovereignty and national security for Europe, its allies and its partners. The very survival of key, even vital industries, from automotive to aerospace to health to energy to defense, is at stake.
Japan’s Energy Policy after Hormuz. Security, Competitiveness, and Decarbonization
The 2026 Hormuz crisis has strengthened rather than weakened the rationale for Japan’s decarbonization strategy, contrary to what might have been expected. Rather than energy policy supplanting climate policy, the two should actually be viewed as inseparable.
Japan and Nuclear Weapons: Between Extended Deterrence and Normative Dilemmas
Since the late 1950s, Japan’s nuclear weapons policy has been based on the coexistence of two competing normative rationales: the rejection of nuclear weapons, rooted in the legacy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the recognition of the central role of US extended nuclear deterrence for Japan’s security.