TB2 Bayraktar: Big Strategy for a Little Drone
Since 2016, the tactical drone TB2 Bayraktar—“standard bearer” in Turkish—has received considerable media attention, particularly during the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020. Thanks to Azerbaijan’s victory over its neighbor Armenia, the drone, manufactured by Baykar, is now a proven combat system with increasing numbers of export clients.
These sales are encouraged by the Turkish government, which is anxious to promote the products of its defense industrial base (DIB). The TB2 enjoys a reputation as an efficient and inexpensive platform and serves as a springboard for the Turkish defense aeronautics industry, which continues to make new announcements about future drone projects.
The Turkish drone has also played an important role in the conflict in Ukraine, where the Ukrainian forces have used it for strategic communications, further strengthening its reputation. Presented as a key factor in several Ukrainian military successes, including the halting of the Russian advance from Belorussia or the destruction of the Moskva cruiser, the TB2 has become one of the symbols of the early stages of the conflict, partly thanks to its distinctive shape. Baykar has also exploited the positive publicity around its flagship product to intensify its own marketing and spotlight its industrial accomplishments.
Beyond this media success story, which the Turkish government has capitalized on to promote its own achievements, it would be useful to put the TB2’s technical performance into perspective in terms of its endurance, capacity, and range. Examination of its military and commercial history enables a more impartial view of this weapons system and its integration into Ankara’s industrial trajectory and strategic plans.
Also available in:
Regions and themes
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
TB2 Bayraktar: Big Strategy for a Little Drone
Author(s)
Léo PÉRIA-PEIGNÉ
Chercheur, Centre des études de sécurité de l'Ifri
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programs
Security Studies Center
Heir to a tradition dating back to the founding of Ifri, the Security Studies Center provides public and private decision-makers as well as the general public with the keys to understanding power relations and contemporary modes of conflict as well as those to come. Through its positioning at the juncture of politics and operations, the credibility of its civil-military team and the wide distribution of its publications in French and English, the Center for Security Studies constitutes in the French landscape of think tanks a unique center of research and influence on the national and international defense debate.
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
EUDIS, HEDI, DIANA: What's behind Three Defense Innovation Acronyms?
In Europe, with Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine showing little sign of abating, a persistent gap remains between security needs and defense spending. According to a 2006 commitment enshrined at the 2014 Wales NATO summit, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members should disburse no less than 2% of their national gross domestic product (GDP) on defense, out of which 20% is to be spent on equipment and research and development. In 2024, only 23 Allies out of 32 are expected to meet or exceed this target, though a significant improvement from only three in 2014. This total includes the United States (US) devoting 3.38% of its GDP to defense, constituting almost 70% of all NATO member defense spending combined.
From Ukraine to Gaza: Military Uses of Artificial Intelligence
The wars in Ukraine and Gaza show us the extent to which artificial intelligence (AI) has become integral to battlefield operations.
French thinking on AI integration and interaction with nuclear command and control, force structure, and decision-making
This paper analyses the French literature on France’s perception of military AI, especially its consequences on strategic systems and competition, and nuclear deterrence.
The Future of Europe’s Strategic Deterrence is (also) at Sea
A cursory look at both France and the UK suggests that the future of European nuclear deterrence is at sea.